Close

November 9, 2013

What Nature Intended

A few weeks ago I decided to begin the process to restore my foreskin. I was cut as an infant and really don’t like that I didn’t have a say in the matter. Yes, it was a different time and infant circumcision was routine in the US then. I certainly don’t fault my parents; they did what they felt was best at the time. Nevertheless, I do feel a sense of loss that an important part of my body was taken with no reason.

Foreskin restoration essentially stretches the skin and, over time, the stretched skin expands. It’s a very long process that often takes years. I bought myself a restoration device as a birthday present and have been using it for several weeks.

20131107_140011-smI’m really noticing results; I’ve always have loose skin, but now the skin is covering the corona most of the time now. Generally I’m staying about 25-33% covered. The color and texture of my glans is changing too! It’s hard to see in the photo, but the part that is regularly covered is brighter and shinier than where there’s no covering.

I’m noticing the feeling of coverage during the course of the day. I have to say the feeling of being covered feels very comforting and safe. It’s kind of a strange feeling, but I really do notice when I’m covered and it feels good!

My motivation for restoring is to restore sensitivity. I strongly feel that removing a part of our anatomy without medical need or consent is completely wrong. I want to feel what nature intended and I’m really motivated that I’m seeing and feeling progress!

The most amazing thing is that I’m noticing significantly increased sensitivity when masturbating! I am very aware of a ring around the base of my glans that is especially pleasurable.

I’m loving what I’m noticing so far! Restoringforeskin.org is a great resource if you want to find out more about this.

7 Comments on “What Nature Intended

Tarnished
November 9, 2013 at 4:40 pm

Wow, that looks awesome. I’ve only ever had one lover, and he is circumcised, but I think that uncut penises are far more beautiful. (Not that cut ones are ugly, mind you. I adore my lover’s shapely member!)

I’m so glad for you, that such a restoration process exists. In the same way that I’d never want my clit or labia cut, I disagree with anyone who endorses male circumcision. I hope that one day soon we can reach more parents/lawmakers and have them realize that genital surgery should never be performed on infants unless medically necessary.

Keep up the restoration, you look fantastic!

Reply
ed
November 9, 2013 at 7:53 pm

Thanks for the kind words!

Reply
Tarnished
November 11, 2013 at 5:40 am

You’re very welcome, Ed. I absolutely love your blog. I realize that it’s directed towards cis men, and generally homosexual ones, so I’m thrilled that you allow me to comment.

It’s just so refreshing to see a man so secure and unashamed of his glorious sexuality and proud of his genitals. I feel that our current society/media does very little to make men feel desired…instead heaping the responsibility of sexiness and attraction solely on women. This is unfair to both sexes, and I dislike that so many people are unable to see the naked male form as beautiful as the female one. Penises are to be cherished just as much as vaginas, in my opinion!

Reply
Tonk
February 5, 2014 at 10:40 am

I also was circumcised – by a government doctor, back in those early days. Seems he might have left a bit extra. Hope my dad gave him a good tip… 😉

I have no opposition to the condition, but also enjoy handling a mate’s UNcut cock. I find that an UNcut glans is shinier than cut, and a bit moist. I could like to have that extra skin, sort of a spit container for masturbating but what the heck.

Good luck with the stretching process and have a great jack ! ! !

Reply
HAROLD
May 2, 2014 at 2:19 pm

When I first got onto the net I was overwhrlmed by the volume of posts on uncut and restoration- so, since my circumcision at age 42 of choice left me quite a bit of skin- I was able to cover and maintain coverage of the glans just by pushing the foreskin foreward and then drawing briefs up close to help keep the foreskin in that position. It was successful almost immediately in keeping the glans covered. Within two weeks the glans was moist and shiny and also was smelly even with more than once a day washings. There was a change in sensitivity- actually to the point that my wife’s touch had to be tolerated rather than purely enjoyed.

I really missed looking down there and not seeing that bare glans! And reaching for that knob and encountering a strip of skin covering it instead!

I was unable to accept the uncut scene. I did try this for 100 days and went back to enjoying the cleanliness and the aesthetics of the trimmed penis.

As my circumcision was done at age 42 with nearly 20 years of married sex already I must say that what was a notable change was that coitus now provided me with a stronger stimulus to the entire coronal edge.

I had worn the foreskin always retracted from age 12 on and have been pleased throughout my life with having sensitivity of the glans without any oversensitivity to diminish sexual stroking of any kind all of which is done with comfort and extreme sensuous pleaure. This result is what has most circumcised males not complaining- because the removal of insulating skin provides good response. When I did still have the foreskin I was always hoping that it would stay positioned back during coitus, not giving a “gliding action” which would be tending to negate proper sliding friction.

I believe that the ladies in general have been sold a bill of goods to expect intact males to provide better sex. The presence of a foreskin would have little effect on lubrication or friction- largely because the coronal ridge contacting inside the vagina is not that much of a lubrication remover. At the most the ridge might distribute some lubrication from deep to where the action is! Some ladies have noted that they are able to feel the husbands penis better after a circumcision!

I think it if we drop the excessive pro_intact BS growing boys can handle neo natal circumcision when the rest of the family is circed or there is a good percentage of peer similarity. There are as much enhancements from the circumcision as to equalize the picture!

Reply
ed
May 3, 2014 at 1:31 pm

I’m glad that you’re happy with your circumcision. I recognize than many men are happy or don’t think much about it. My problem with infant circumcision is that the boy has no choice in the matter. Unless there is a medical or religious reason, I can’t see why parents would make this decision for their child. Once the child is old enough to decide for himself he can certainly choose to undergo the procedure.
I’ve noticed a significant increase in sensitivity since beginning my restoration process. I now have coverage over half my glans. The area this is covered has a different skin texture than the part not covered. The area covered is also much more sensitive.

Reply
Tarnished
May 3, 2014 at 5:37 pm

I agree with you, Ed. There’s nothing inherently wrong with a man getting circumcised…same as if someone decides they want tattoos, piercings, labiaplasty, body modifications, etc. But it should be THAT person’s choice, never someone else’s. If an adult man/woman wishes to alter their genitals thats one thing. Doing it to an infant or preteen who has no say? Disgusting.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *